Dilla's Rosebud moment

by Amar Patel in ,


 
Front cover of Dan Charnas' book about producer J Dilla, called Dilla Time
 

My copy of Dilla Time by Dan Charnas is very dog-eared. It might be irresistible trivia about where that sample came from and why it sounds different to the original. A musicological analysis of the beat, tracing the evolution of the drum machine to Midi Production Centre (MPC). Or passages that transport us to basements and studios as pivotal tracks are being made.

But above all, it's the insight into Detroit's history, the Yancey family and how James became J Dilla (via Jon Doe, Jay Dee, Dill Withers and other aliases) that I found most captivating.

On a journalistic front, I am full of admiration. This book is a rigorous piece of research, with the author constructing a largely third-person narrative from more than 190 interviews, published/unpublished interviews with Dilla, and a stack of other research (check the bibliography).

I do love my direct quotes. They take us to a place and time and make us part of the conversation. But Dan's approach works because he manages to pour all these discoveries and recollections into a master narrative, building an argument and maintaining the momentum from chapter to chapter like an accomplished storyteller.

There's a real determination on the page to trace Dilla's musical heritage to the Motor City (down to the street grid), to analyse his unique sense of rhythm on a mathematical level and to lend thesis-level weight to the argument that he changed music (not just hip-hop, all popular music). He certainly didn’t just switch off quantization (time correction) and become great overnight – a gross oversimplification that bugged Dan enough to start thinking about setting the record straight with Dilla Time.

This is no hagiography. We get to know the man behind the legend, flaws and all. The character study side of this book is illuminating. The cultivation of persona – sometimes in service of the music but also detrimental to it – and the corrosive nature of ego. The pursuit of credit and status. How a lingering sense of bitterness and betrayal clouds perception when forgiveness is often the reset we all need.

Dan is a great custodian of this story, writing and reporting with sensitivity and empathy. He's always willing to present different sides of that story, to suspend judgment and, where possible, to let the facts speak for themselves. He took the time to earn trust and have readbacks with sources, always considering different versions of reality as he puts it.

There is no better example of this than the squabble over Dilla's estate. Fractured relationships shattered in grief, open conflicts and agendas, questionable intentions on several fronts and mother Maureen 'Ma Dukes' determination to protect her son's legacy perhaps to a fault.

Listen to enough of Dilla’s music and you know he had a great ear for a sample, a unique touch on the MPC and a perpetual will to break convention. Thanks to Dan, we now have the vocabulary and knowledge to understand what made this musician a genius, on par with the likes of Thelonious Monk, John Coltrane and Duke Ellington in his eyes.

A few months ago, the author was a guest on the podcast Broken Record with his old Def American Recordings boss Rick Rubin. Reminiscing aside, it's a compelling conversation about music making, inspiration and how ideas take shape.

This is my favourite moment, also a highlight of the book, where Dan makes the bonkers connection between an aside from a Dilla interview, the out-of-sync claps at the party climax to a Sidney Poitier film called A Piece of the Action and Dilla time being described as anything from “offbeat” to “drunk”. Tremendous detective work.

Next, we can look forward to the feature-length documentary, based on Dilla Time and executive-produced by Summer of Soul Oscar winner Questlove.

BUY

PS Why does Dan call this Dilla’s “Rosebud moment”? It’s a Citizen Kane thing.

Also, I recommend this Vox video about how Dilla humanised the MPC and made it “an extension of himself”.

It’s worth checking two other conversations with Dan. This one with pianist Jason Moran (whose playing style was influenced by Dilla, particularly this track by Busta Rhymes). We learn how Dilla used his lived experience, the landscape and stimuli of The D to “face the beat” as Moran puts it. To construct, then continuously reconstruct, his own sense of syncopation. An architect of his own environment. The link between how a person speaks and plays also blew my mind. FYI, Young James was a stutterer. Highlights are here.

The second one is an Artform event in LA with author Oliver Wang and Stones Throw label owner Peanut Butter Wolf. The discussion about Dilla’s aura and why fans are so fervent about his legacy over someone like Tupac (also a great talent gone too soon) is interesting.

Bonus: Here’s a little mix of some of my favourite productions and remixes by Jay Dee/J Dilla. No doubt, there will be a second volume.



Amar Patel

Pride and joy in Harlem '69

by Amar Patel in ,


The last time I went to the cinema was more than 18 months ago. On Sunday I settled in for Summer of Soul at Catford Mews. A music doc fan feeling highly expectant though dazed by the baking weather outside. To be hit with this rush of on-stage brilliance – after months without live concerts and gigs – was overwhelming.

Look, there’s Stevie Wonder in a fitted brown suit and frilly lemon shirt knocking out a thunderous drum solo beneath an umbrella. A new flex. Not a bad way to open. You’ve got velvet-suited David Ruffin, who’s just left The Temptations, reminiscing about ‘My Girl’ with the 50,000-strong crowd.

Exile Hugh Masekela – no stranger to oppression and police brutality – blowing out across a sea of weary brothers and sisters like a clarion call to freedom. Max Roach and Abbey Lincoln just shining with majesty and doing what they do – living “unapologetically black”. The Chambers Brothers biggin’ up Harlem with their infectious rhythm & blues.

Sly Stone appears on stage as if from another dimension, together with his interracial psychedelic soul family, prompting a stampede to the front of stage that threatens to halt the show. Some of the crowd are bewildered by their otherworldliness – the clothes, the unfamiliar groove, a white man on drums, a woman on trumpet – but by the end of their set, songs such as ‘Everyday People’ and ‘I Want To Take You HIgher’ are doing just that.

There’s The 5th Dimension in their orange-tasselled suits, coming home as they offer a spun-out take on ‘Age of Aquarius’ (from the musical Hair), a ubiquitous hit that had conquered the airwaves that spring. Even the likes of Ray Barretto and Mongo Santamaria are there, throwing down on them congas.

In a fever dream, this could have all happened on the same day but Summer of Soul actually documents Harlem Cultural Festival – a series of free concerts which took place over six weekends in the summer of 1969 at Mount Morris Park. This was the third and biggest edition, a turning point in black consciousness, a liberation.

It’s almost impossible to convey the turmoil of that period, particularly what it felt like to be black and under threat in America, but this time capsule of film sets the scene well through archive footage and crowd reactions. (Wattstax aside, I’ve never seen a concert film that gives so much screen time to faces in a crowd. That’s a huge part of its charm.)

Think about it: the progressive JFK assassinated in 1963, Harlem’s own Malcolm X in 1965, Dr Martin Luther King followed by Bobby Kennedy in 1968, the Vietnam war is raging on, magnifying the trauma of black soldiers…

The Civil Rights Act has been expanded and yet black people are still experiencing discrimination, poverty, hostile environments in desegregated schools. Meanwhile, they’re putting a man on the moon (right in the middle of Stevie’s set, in fact). Amid a chorus of boos, one man sums up the prevailing mood about this jingoistic misallocation of funds: “What’s on the moon? Nothing!”

If Summer of Soul only gave us a string of incredible performances, it would still be a triumph. But we are also witnessing a mass communion of black joy in the face of persistent hardship and tragedies. Hip youth in their dashikis, floral patterns, fly shades and fros looking hopeful as they rub shoulders with churchgoing elders in their Sunday best. Awestruck kids, bop, sing and dream of what could be. Harlem Cultural Festival stoked the pride of each and every one of them. As Rev Al Sharpton says in the film, 1969 was the year that “the negro died and black was born”.

And language is important, as demonstrated by an interview with Charlayne Hunter-Gault, who became the first black female journalist in the New York Times newsroom. She fought her editors to make the switch from “negro” to “black”, to reflect this awakening.

Perhaps Nina Simone’s set best evokes this affirmation. She saunters regally to the piano wearing a crown of braided hair and earrings like antiquities, sitting down and pummelling the keys as she reminds everyone that they are young, gifted and black. The climax to her incendiary set is a recitation of a black nationalist poem by David Nelson. “Are you ready to smash white things, to burn buildings? … Are you ready to build black things? Are you ready to kill, if necessary?” she asks to a chorus of yeahs.

With this new attitude of self-determination and defiance came a more ambitious approach to enterprise and cooperation, according to the Houston Chronicle. “For black folks, the added power and energy of coming together in a place where one could not only see hear and feel blackness on stage but also participate in a marketplace of neighbourhood business owners was its own form of sustainability.”

Two big questions arise. How the hell did this festival happen and why are we only hearing about now? We learn that exuberant, St Kitts-born entertainer and host Tony Lawrence was a key driving force – a vital bridge between the Parks Department, white politicians with national aspirations such as NY mayor John Lindsay and black community organisers including Reverand Jesse Jackson who features in the film. (Lawrence even secured Maxwell House as a corporate sponsor, though they lent a little too heavily on their link to “the dark continent” based on the ad we see.)

You can see the motive of allies such as Lindsay. With riots a real possibility, this might be a good way to quell potential unrest in the city. Sadly not everyone got behind the event, namely the indifferent/discriminant NYPD, so the Black Panthers took care of security. And it’s worth mentioning that, the festival “came together with no significant trouble, no arrests and no record of public inconvenience,” according to Harlem ’69 author Stuart Cosgrove.

Contrast that with its correlative, which would take place a hundred miles south and two weeks later. It promised “three days of peace and music” but, depending on who you talk to, ended up being a crashed party that overwhelmed promoters and authorities. The fact that Woodstock is remembered as a countercultural milestone might have something to do with the widespread availability of the film.

Lawrence subsequently tried to take the festival on a national tour but eventually gave up due to a lack of private funding. He also claimed there were shady goings-on, including an accusation that funds were stolen by his lawyers and business partners, Jerrold Kushnick and Harold Beldock.

Hal Tulchin is a hero in all of this. He shot the footage and was resourceful enough to build the stage facing west so he could film all afternoon without expensive lighting. He tried again and again to turn his footage into a documentary, approaching production companies and TV networks and pitching it as the “Black Woodstock”.

A couple of WNEW-TV one-hour specials aside, Harlem Cultural Festival remained barely a footnote in black history until those 40 hours of footage, immaculately preserved in on two-inch reels despite laying in a basement for more than 50 years, found their way into the hands of producers Robert Fyvolent (who first approached Tulchin in 2007) and David Dinerstein in 2017.

Not even Questlove knew about the festival until approached to direct. Amazing when you consider how deep this man’s crates are, how voracious and encyclopaedic he is about music, movements, lineage. He lived with the footage for five months as it played on loop around his home, eventually curating this film like a DJ set. The first cut was beyond four hours. And we’ve yet to see more than 60% of Tulchin’s footage.

My highlight from Summer of Soul will take some beating though. We see Mahalia Jackson inviting a young Mavis Staples to perform a rendition of Dr King’s favourite song ‘Precious Lord, Take My Hand’ [which he asked accompanying saxophonist Ben Branch to play the day he died]. It’s a passing of the torch. But then Jackson must like what she hears, or the spirit takes hold and she joins. Stood there together sharing the same mic, summoning all they can give, it’s as if right there and then, the magnitude of this glorious moment hits them. They soar and soar. And we join them.

Where’s Hendrix? Surely he should have been on these bills in 1969? Well, he was turned down according to Questlove. Instead, he played a series of unofficial aftershows in Harlem spots with Freddie King. Then came Woodstock and you know the rest.



Amar Patel